Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Histomorphometry and Stability Analysis of Loaded Implants with two Different Surface Conditions in Beagle Dogs

±è»ó¹Ì, ¹ÚÂùÁø, ±è´ë°ï,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±è»ó¹Ì ( Kim Sang-Mi ) - °­¸ª´ëÇб³
¹ÚÂùÁø ( Park Chan-Jin ) - °­¸ª´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
±è´ë°ï ( Kim Dae-Gon ) - °­¸ª´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç

Abstract

ÃÖÀûÀÇ °ñÀ¯ÂøÀ» ¾ò±â À§ÇÏ¿© ÀÓÇöõÆ® µðÀÚÀÎÀÇ °³¼±°ú ´Ù¾çÇÑ Ç¥¸éó¸® ¹æ¹ýÀÌ °³¹ßµÇ¾î ¿Ô´Âµ¥, ƯÈ÷ ÃÖ±Ù ¾ËÄ®¸® ¿¡Äª°ú ÀÌ¿Â ÁÖÀÔ¹ý, ¾ç±Ø»êÈ­¹ý µî »ýÈ­ÇÐÀûÀÎ °ñÀ¯ÂøÀ» À¯µµÇÒ ¼ö Àִ ǥ¸é°³Áú ¹æ¹ýÀÌ °ü½ÉÀÇ ´ë»óÀÌ µÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¹æ¹ý Áß ¸¶±×³×½· ÀÌ¿ÂÀ» ÇÔÀ¯ÇÑ ÀüÇؾ׼ӿ¡¼­ ¾ç±Ø»êÈ­ÇǸ·Ã³¸®ÇÑ ÀÓÇöõÆ®(¸¶±×³×½· ÀÓÇöõÆ®)¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© Á¶±â ÇÏÁßÀÇ °¡´É¼ºÀÌ Á¦½ÃµÈ ¹Ù ÀÖ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ¸¶±×³×½· ÀÓÇöõÆ®ÀÇ °æ¿ì Àå±â°£ÀÇ ±â´ÉÀû ÇÏÁßÀ» °¡ÇÑ °æ¿ì¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸°¡ ºÎÁ·ÇÑ »óÅÂÀ̹ǷÎ, ÀÌ¿¡ º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â ºñ±Û°ßÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ µ¿¹°½ÇÇèÀ» ÅëÇØ Áö¿¬ÇÏÁßÀ» °¡ÇÑ ¸¶±×³×½· ÀÓÇöõÆ®ÀÇ ¹æ»ç¼±Àû, ÀÓ»ó ¾ÈÁ¤¼º °Ë»ç ¹× Á¶Á÷ÇüÅÂÇÐÀû ºÐ¼®À» ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿© È­ÇÐÀû Ç¥¸é°³Áú ÀÓÇöõÆ®ÀÇ °ñÁ¶Á÷ ¹ÝÀÀÀ» ±â°è°¡°ø ÀÓÇöõÆ®¿Í ºñ±³ Æò°¡ÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¹ßÄ¡ ÈÄ 3°³¿ùÀÇ Ä¡À¯°úÁ¤À» °¡Áø ºñ±Û ¼º°ß 6¸¶¸®ÀÇ ÇϾǿ¡ Á¿ì 3°³¾¿ ½ÇÇè¿ëÀ¸·Î Á¦ÀÛµÈ Á÷°æ 3.75 mm, ±æÀÌ 10.0 mmÀÇ ³ª»ç ÇüÅ ÀÓÇöõÆ® 36°³¸¦ º¸ÆíÀûÀÎ ÀÓÇöõÆ® ½Ã¼ú½Ã ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ´Â ½Ä¸³¹ýÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ½Ä¸³ÇÏ¿´´Ù. 18°³ÀÇ ´ëÁ¶±ºÀº ±â°è°¡°ø¸¸ ÇÑ »óÅ¿´°í, ½ÇÇ豺Àº ¸¶±×³×½·À» ÇÔÀ¯ÇÑ ÀüÇؾ׿¡¼­ ¾ç±Ø»êÈ­ ÇǸ·Ã³¸®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ½Ä¸³ ÈÄ 3°³¿ù µ¿¾ÈÀÇ Ä¡À¯±â°£ ÈÄ ÀÌÂ÷¼ö¼úÀ» ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ¿¬°á°íÁ¤ÇÏÁö ¾Ê°í ´ÜÀÏÄ¡ ±Ý°ü¼öº¹À¸·Î º¸Ã¶¹°À» ÀåÂøÇÏ¿© ÇÏÁßÀ» °¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. 3°³¿ù µ¿¾È ÇÏÁßÀ» °¡ÇÑ ÈÄ¿¡ Èñ»ý½ÃÄÑ ºñŻȸ ¿¬¸¶ Ç¥º»À» Á¦ÀÛÇÏ¿© Á¶Á÷ÇüÅ °èÃøÇÐÀû ºÐ¼®À» ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÓÇöõÆ® ½Ä¸³½Ã, ÀÌÂ÷ ¼ö¼ú½Ã, ÇÏÁßÀ» °¡ÇÑ 1°³¿ù, 3°³¿ù ÈÄ¿¡ º¯¿¬°ñ Èí¼ö¸¦ Æò°¡Çϱâ À§ÇØ ¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐÀû °Ë»ç¸¦ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´°í, °ñ°è¸é »çÀÌ¿¡¼­ÀÇ ¾ÈÁ¤¼ºÀ» Æò°¡Çϱâ À§ÇØ °øÁøÁÖÆļö ¼öÄ¡¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Mann-Whitney U test¿Í repeated measured ANOVA¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© 95 ÆÛ¼¾Æ® À¯ÀǼöÁØÀ¸·Î Åë°èÀû À¯ÀǼºÀ» È®ÀÎÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÃÑ 36°³ÀÇ ÀÓÇöõÆ® Áß 8°³¿¡¼­ ÀÏÂ÷ ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ °ñÀ¯ÂøÀÇ ½ÇÆа¡ ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, 1°³´Â 3°³¿ùÀÇ ºÎÇÏ ÈÄ¿¡ ½ÇÆÐ ¾ç»óÀÌ ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. °øÁøÁÖÆļöºÐ¼®°á°ú, ¸¶±×³×½· ÀÓÇöõÆ®±ºÀº ´ëÁ¶±º°ú´Â ´Þ¸® °øÁøÁÖÆļö ¼öÄ¡°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Ù°¡ ´Ù¼Ò °¨¼ÒÇÏ´Â ¾ç»óÀ» º¸¿´À¸¸ç, ÇÏÁßÀ» °¡ÇÑ 3°³¿ù ÈÄ¿¡´Â µÎ ±ºÀÇ ¼öÄ¡°¡ ºñ½ÁÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¹æ»ç¼± »çÁø ºÐ¼® °á°ú µÎ ±º ¸ðµÎ ½Ã°£¿¡ µû¸¥ º¯¿¬°ñ Èí¼ö·®ÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ´Â ¾ø¾ú´Ù. Á¶Á÷ÇüÅÂÇÐÀûÀÎ ºÐ¼® °á°ú ¸¶±×³×½·-ÀÓÇöõÆ®°¡ ´ëÁ¶±º¿¡ ºñÇØ ´õ ³ôÀº ¼öÄ¡ÀÇ °ñÀÓÇöõÆ® °è¸éÁ¢ÃËÀ²À» º¸¿© ÁÖ¾úÀ¸³ª, ³ª»ç»ê³» °ñ¸éÀûÀº ´õ ³·¾Ò´Ù. ±×·¯³ª µÎ ±º ¸ðµÎ¿¡¼­ Åë°èÀû À¯ÀǼºÀº ¾ø¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ»óÀÇ °á°ú¿¡¼­ Áö¿¬ ÇÏÁßÀ» °¡ÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì¿¡ À־ °ñÀ¯Âø¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¸¶±×³×½·-ÀÓÇöõÆ®ÀÇ È¿°ú´Â ±â°è°¡°øµÈ ÀÓÇöõÆ®¿Í À¯»çÇÏ¿´´Ù. Á¶±â ÇÏÁ߽à ´õ ºü¸£°í °­ÇÑ °ñ¹ÝÀÀÀ» º¸¿©ÁÖ´ø ÀÌÀü ¿¬±¸¿Í Á¾ÇÕÇÏ¿© º¼ ¶§, ¸¶±×³×½· ÀÓÇöõÆ®´Â Áï½Ã ¶Ç´Â Á¶±â ÇÏÁß °¡´É¼ºÀ» ÁõÁø½ÃÄÑ ÁÖ¸ç, Áö¿¬ ÇÏÁß¿¡¼­´Â »ýü ÀûÇÕ¼ºÀÌ ¿ì¼öÇÑ Å¸ÀÌŸ´½°ú À¯»çÇÑ °ñÀ¯Âø Á¤µµ¸¦ º¸ÀÌ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ÀÓ»óÀûÀ¸·Î È­ÇÐÀû Ç¥¸é°³Áú ¹æ¹ýÀÇ À¯¿ë¼ºÀ» ÆÇ´ÜÇϱâ À§ÇØ ´Ù¾çÇÏ°í Àå±âÀûÀÎ ÀÓ»ó ¿¬±¸°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇϸ®¶ó »ç·áµÈ´Ù.

Despite an improved bone reactions of Mg-incorporated implants in the animals, little yet has been carried out by the experimental investigations in functional loading conditions. This study investigated the clinical and histologic parameters of osseointegrated Mg-incorporated implants in delayed loading conditions. A total of 36 solid screw implants (diameter 3.75 mm, length 10mm) were placed in the mandibles of 6 beagle dogs. Test groups included 18 Mg-incorporated implants. Turned titanium Implants served as control. Gold crowns were inserted 3 months. Radiographic assessments and stabilitytests were performed at the time of fixture installation, 2nd stage surgery, 1 and 3 months after loading. Histological observations and morphometrical measurements were also performed. Of 36 implants, 32 displayed no discernible mobility, corresponding to successful clinical function. There was no statistically significant difference between test implants and controls in marginal bone levels (p=0.413) and RFA values. The mean BIC % in the Mg-implants was 54.4 ¡¾ 20.2%. The mean BIC % in the turned implant was 48.9 ¡¾ 8.0%. These differences between the Mg-implant and control implant were not statistically significant (P=0.264). In the limitation of this study, bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone area of Mg-incorporated oxidized implant were similar to machine-turned implant. The stability analysis showed no significantly different ISQ values and marginal bone loss between two groups. Considering time-dependent bone responses of Mg-implant, it seems that Mg-implants enhanced bone responses in early loading conditions and osseointegrated similarly to cp Ti implants in delayed loading conditions. However, further investigations are necessary to obtain long-term bone response of the Mg-implant in human.

Å°¿öµå

ÇÏÁß;»ýÈ­ÇÐÀû °áÇÕ;¸¶±×³×½·-ÀÓÇöõÆ®;°øÁøÁÖÆļö ºÐ¼®;°ñÀÓÇöõÆ®°è¸é Á¢ÃËÀ²;°ñ¸éÀû
biochemical bonding;Mg-incorporated implant;delayed loading;RFA;BIC

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI